|
| |
Health Panel Affirms the Many Benefits of
Modern Food Biotechnology
New York, NY—September 2000. Physicians and
scientists affiliated with the American Council
on Science and Health (ACSH) assert that
modern biotechnology, as applied to a variety
of crops and foods, presents no inherent
risks to consumers or the environment. Indeed,
they state that these methods will provide
many benefits to consumers, farmers, and
food processors.
In the second edition of the popular
publication,
Biotechnology and Food, ACSH discusses
and
reviews the basics of modern biotechnology—also
called "gene splicing," "genetic
modification," "recombinant
DNA
technology," "bioengineering,"
and "genetic engineering."
The
author of the report—agricultural molecular
biologist Dr. Alan McHughen of the
University
of Saskatchewan —explains that modern
biotechnology
provides elegant simplifications of
the traditional
types of genetic changes that we humans
have
been introducing into our foods for
many
generations.
"The main difference," notes
Dr.
Ruth Kava, ACSH director of nutrition,
"is
that the modern processes are much
more specific.
Instead of transferring hundreds or
even
thousands of genes with traditional
breeding,
modern methods allow biologists to
move only
the gene or genes that are known to
have
the desired effects."
With the advent of modern biotechnology,
farmers can grow crops with "built-in"
pesticides, reducing the need for widespread
spraying. Further, bioengineered crops
will
provide consumers with cooking oils
that
have more healthful types of fatty
acids.
In the future, farmers may well be
able to
grow crops on lands that were too dry
or
salty for traditional varieties. Staple
foods
like rice can be enhanced with extra
nutrients
such as beta-carotene. Such advances
are
likely just a few years away from widespread
availability, and could go far to reduce
the toll of childhood blindness, malnutrition,
and anemia in some areas of the world.
In the report, Dr. McHughen addresses
some
of the public's concerns about modern
biotechnology,
and shows that they are largely unwarranted.
For example, he notes that fears that
such
foods are unregulated are baseless.
In the
United States, any new food—produced
by traditional
or new methods—must be rigorously scrutinized
before it can be marketed to consumers.
It
must be shown, for example, whether
the nutrient
content or that of naturally occurring
toxic
substances is changed. It is important
to
note that bioengineered crops have
been part
of the North American food supply since
1996,
and no adverse effects have been noted
in
humans, wildlife, or the environment.
Dr. Elizabeth Whelan, ACSH president,
notes
that "Government regulation, consumer
acceptance, and private-sector investment
are all important factors in the future
status
of foods produced by modern biotechnology."
She added, "It would be tragic
if fear
and superstition were allowed to impede
the
development of this incredibly valuable
technology."
A copy of " Biotechnology and Food"
2nd edition may be downloaded fromwww.acsh.org/publications/booklets/biotechnology2000.pdfHard copies are available for $5.00 from
ACSH, 1995 Broadway, Second Floor, New York,
NY 10023.
The American Council on Science and
Health
is a consortium of more than 350 scientists
and physicians dedicated to consumer
education
on public health issues, such as the
environment,
nutrition, and pharmaceuticals. ACSH
attempts
to illuminate the difference between
real
health risks and hypothetical or trivial
health scares.
|
|